EPISODE 11
Daniel 9-11 announces three key moments: Constantine around 300,
Hitler around 1950 and the great tribulation around 2055
-------
Contents
PART 1 Daniel 9 divides history into 70 weeks of 30 years to
follow after the writing of the Bible
A) The general chronological framework and the two anointed
ones: Constantine and Hitler
B) Hitler's death will trigger a flood of immigration
that will constantly intensify until the end
C) The jews gradually install the abomination of
desolation and start the great tribulation
PART 2: Daniel 11 describes the key stages of the conflict
between Aryan mankind and the rest of the world
D) The First World War
E) World War II
F) The Marshall Plan
G) More and more top leadership positions in the Western
states are increasingly openly taken over by jews
H) After the Cold War, the jew starts the final globalization
stage so as to shape the whole humankind according to
his worldview
I) The Jew starts to partially lose the control of the
non-white world around the time of writing (2022)
J) The Jew completes around 2050-2060 the installation of the
abomination of desolation, starting the great tribulation
K) Even the strongest men will completely drop their
guard in front of the gas chamber myth
L) A more uncertain future when the jewish dominated Aryan
mankind will even turn against its own fatherland
-------
Foreword: The prophecies written by Daniel 2500 years ago
contain a certain degree of mystery. Even Daniel himself
could not completely understand them all. In verse 12:9, an
angel said to him: "the words are closed up and sealed until
the time of the end". Indeed, these prophecies have been
sealed for a long time: to decode them, we need to match
them to a series of past events or historical processes. I
think we finally arrived in 2022 at a time when we can start
this work.
PART 1 Daniel 9 divides history into 70 weeks of 30 years to
follow after the writing of the Bible
A) The general chronological framework and the two anointed
ones: Constantine and Hitler
>Daniel 9:24 Seventy "sevens" are decreed
>for your people and your holy city to
>finish transgression, to put an end to
>sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring
>in everlasting righteousness, to seal up
>vision and prophecy and to anoint the
>Most Holy Place.
The traditional reading associates this verse with the 70
years of exile of the ancient Israelites in Babylon.
Although this level of reading is (also) possible, I
consider here an interpretation concerning the future:
these 70 years or 70 periods point to the moment when God
will restore his "holy city" or his "Most Holy Place", to
"put an end to sin" and "bring in everlasting righteousness".
This may mark the end of world history as we have always
known it. The new kingdom of God will replace all forms of
organization and all kingdoms that mankind has ever
conceived. As described by the last sentence of Episode 1
[citing Daniel 2:44 NLT], "the God of heaven will set up a
kingdom that will never be destroyed; no one will ever
conquer it. It will shatter all these kingdoms into
nothingness, but it will stand forever."
There are also certain similarities between the exile of the
ancient Israelites in Babylon and the migratory phenomena
concerning the Aryan peoples of Europe today. We certainly
have no trains that take us into exile, but Europe itself is
invaded by countless foreign races. Thus, Europe itself has
become a land of exile, a new Babylonian kingdom,
characterized by excessive hedonism and racial chaos, all
in a context of unrestricted commercial trade that favors
race mixing, identitary confusion and moral relativism.
>Daniel 9:25 Know and understand this:
>From the time the word goes out to
>restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the
>Anointed One,[Or an anointed one; also
>in verse 26] the ruler, comes, there
>will be seven "sevens" and sixty-two
>"sevens."
The first question is: when is the moment when "word goes
out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem"? For Christians, the
physical city of Jerusalem foreshadows the new Jerusalem,
the heavenly (or spiritual) Jerusalem. It is the capital of
God's Kingdom. For several years after Jesus's death, the
physical city of Jerusalem was naturally the capital of
Christendom. The first council was there held in 50 AC.
But after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70,
the apostles had to work to build a new Jerusalem, that is,
a new Christian kingdom with other centers of power (Rome,
Alexandria, etc.). The moment when "word goes out to
restore and rebuild Jerusalem" points approximately to the
time when the Bible was finalized. The Bible represents this
"word" sent out to rebuild the kingdom of God.
The last book of the Bible (Revelation) was written around
the year 90. Its Wikipedia entry (translated from French)
says: "The majority of modern theological scholars agree
that Revelation was written towards the end of the reign of
Domitian, in any case during the reign of this Roman
emperor, between the years 80 and 96." I prefer to take the
year 90 as a reference point, but we must accept a tolerance
margin of around 5-6 years for all the chronological
calculations that I will present later.
The second question is: who is this "Anointed One" mentioned
by verse 25? Citing an idea from episode 4bis, "Many have
made the mistake of thinking that each time the Bible
mentions a future king, it must necessarily be Jesus
Christ". Thus, many have automatically associated this
anointed one with Jesus Christ. However, the indication
above in square brackets (a footnote of the NIV translation)
states that it is "an anointed one" rather than "the
Anointed One". Since Jesus Christ cannot be an anointed one
among others, I propose a different interpretation. This
passage mentions two anointed ones: the first one arrives
after 7 periods (weeks) and the second one after 62 periods.
According to an idea that I have already used when I made an
equivalence between 10 days and 300 years (episode 9, point
C), the length of a period can be fixed to 30 years. This
leads to two key moments:
1) 90+7*30 = 300
2) 90 + 62*30 = 90 + 1860 = 1950
Given the reasonable margin of tolerance of 5-6 years, we
identify these two key moments with two great warriors
who marked the history of the peoples of Europe:
1) Constantine was emperor (or co-emperor) of the Roman
Empire starting in 306. He played a truly unique and crucial
role in Church history, because he legalized Christianity.
His famous Edict of Milan put an end to the terrible Roman
persecution institutionalized by his predecessors. Shortly
after this edict of toleration (in just a few decades),
Christianity exploded to become the dominant religion of
the Roman Empire.
2) Hitler died in 1945. He not only exposed the Jewish
monster to the light of day, but he defined in a very clear
and admirable way the notion of Aryan civilization.
Several of Daniel's prophecies evoke Greece and an enigmatic
Empire of the North. A first level of reading can stop at
ancient Greece. But the more general level of reading that
interests us here is the one conceptualized by Hitler.
Leon Degrelle expressed his vision as follows:
"For him, Germany was only an instrument
in the same way that France of 1800 was
only an instrument for Napoleon. The
latter was half Italian, whereas Hitler
was Austrian; both of them wanted to
realize an imperial dream that must
logically exceed the narrow boundaries
of their countries of adoption. I once
asked Hitler what he was, whether he was
German or European, and he gave me this
quite surprising answer: "I am Greek".
By this he meant how much he felt he was
the heir of the whole European culture,
old of three thousand years, built on
this vast space that goes from the Germanic
forests to the Mediterranean coasts."
I continue the analysis of verse 25.
>Daniel 9:25 (continuation) It will be
>rebuilt with streets and a trench but in
>times of trouble.
The new Jerusalem, or the Christian Church, has been indeed
rebuilt "in times of trouble", because the Church
experienced countless tragedies and hardships during during
its two millennia of existence. The history of Christian
Europe is nothing but an endless list of wars; the Church
was vandalized countless times. The task was long and
difficult; the Christians who contributed to it had to be
more combative and heroic than the modern ones.
This passage describes the new Jerusalem as a city protected
by a trench (or by a wall in other translations). The
traditional Church has always had borders that the
Christians often defended at the risk of their lives, for
example, by repelling Muslims invaders countless times.
This is the perfect opposite of the attitude of the modern
church, that has been seduced by the Jewish idea that any
moral human construction must be "without borders", because
borders would be non-inclusive, politically incorrect, etc.
If the European Christian fortress was surrounded by a
trench, it is (also) because the Christians of the time had
a strong will to defend their collective identity. We
should not limit the interpretation to the strictly physical
level. Any physical construction is the expression of a
moral structure. Hitler explains in Mein Kampf that
"Bastions of fortresses will not save it (note: speaking of
the people organized in state), but the living wall of its
men and women, filled with an ardent love for their country
and a passionate spirit of national patriotism". And if
this is true at a national level, it must also be true for
the race, for its spirituality and for its religion.
B) Hitler's death will trigger a flood of immigration
that will constantly intensify until the end
>Daniel 9:26 After the sixty-two
>"sevens," the Anointed One will be put
>to death and will have nothing.
It was not only Hitler who was "put to death". His whole
doctrine and worldview were outlawed after 1945; we can not
even mention the notion of Aryan mankind in the public
sphere. However, certain translations (see NLT) say
"appearing to have accomplished nothing". This meaning has
also been favored by the theological scholars who have
seen Jesus Christ in this prophecy. I explained above why I
do not think this prophecy is about Jesus; nonetheless, I
find a real Christ-like aspect: Hitler and his followers
were destroyed by the Jews of their time, yet their spirit
will arise.
>Daniel 9:26 (continuation) The people of
>the ruler who will come will destroy the
>city and the sanctuary. The end will
>come like a flood: War will continue
>until the end, and desolations have been
>decreed.
The new master of the world is the jew who has decided to
destroy "the city and the sanctuary", that is, the European
construction and its (Christian) spirituality. This war
against Aryan mankind -- also called the war of Gog and
Magog in the episodes 4, 4bis, 9 and 10 -- continues by
bringing in endless waves of immigrants. Our fatherland is
flooded with alien races and this will "continue until the
end" without interruption.
C) The jews gradually install the abomination of
desolation and start the great tribulation
>Daniel 9:27 He will confirm a covenant
>with many for one seven. In the middle
>of the seven he will put an end to
>sacrifice and offering. And at the
>temple he will set up an abomination
>that causes desolation, until the end
>that is decreed is poured out on him.
After 1945, mankind accepted to rebuild itself on an
ideological foundation largely restricted to moral values
acceptable to jews. Everybody agreed to banish anti-Semitism
and to never throw any collective guilt on jews. This new
way of thinking often defines evil by reducing it to Nazism
or to Hitler. All this shows the "covenant" confirmed "with
many". The Western economy worked quite well for 2-3
decades after the war; many thought that it would go on like
that for a long time, at least "for one seven" (see
chronology below).
But history has shown this was an illusory hope. Under the
cover of an ideal of universal brotherhood, the Jews
gradually continued their vast war against Aryan mankind.
Halfway through the seven periods mentioned above ("In the
middle of the seven"), organized Jewry will finish
installing the "abomination that causes desolation".
I suggest the following chronology. These 7 periods
[composing the above 'seven'] are added to the 62 weeks
elapsed between 90 and 1950. They thus cover a period of
approximately 7*30=210 years. The abomination that causes
desolation will be completely established about halfway
through these 210 years, that is, after roughly 105 years,
around the year 1950+105=2055. Since we suffer from a slow
apocalypse manipulated by the jews from the shadows, I don't
believe there will be a clear-cut demarcation in 2055.
Rather, I would say that the decade 2050-2060 will mark a
turning point when (the tyranny of) this abomination that
causes desolation [note: also called "the sacrilegious
object that causes desecration"] will be fully functional.
This moment will also mark the beginning of the great
tribulation, according to the sermon of Jesus mentioned at
point J) below.
We can extrapolate from the current situation to try to
anticipate this abomination that will mark the beginning of
the great tribulation. We can already see in 2022 that the
Aryan man has fewer and fewer rights and less and less
power. But the Jews have not reached their worst yet. If in
2022 there are still countless white men who have a decent
job and live relatively well, I think their number will
decline decade after decade. The world ruling clique will
probably establish an incredible tyranny that will unleash
all the forces of hell to crush all that remains of European
civilization.
I think the great tribulation will continue for the second
half of these 7 periods, to cover approximately the years
2055-2160. Other biblical prophecies on the great
tribulation mention 3.5 years. Other prophetic writings say
42 months or 1260 days. Still others use the expression "a
time, times and half a time", see also Note 1.
PART 2: Daniel 11 describes the key stages of the conflict
between Aryan mankind and the rest of the world
The prophecy of Seventy Weeks discussed in Part 1 considered
a division of world history into 70 weeks of 30 years. I
have already addressed the first 69=62+7 weeks that roughly
cover the years 90-2160. If I said nothing about week 70, it
is because I would like to remain cautious and not say
anything about what will happen after 2160 (after the great
tribulation). It is anyway more useful today to anticipate
the great tribulation of the years 2055-2160 (the 3.5
periods of 30 years until the end of Week 69).
D) The First World War
Verses 1-9 of chapter 11 first mention a war between the
Persians and the Greeks (Daniel 11:2). Many agree that
Daniel 11:4 is a prophecy about Alexander the Great, because
his empire was divided into four parts after his death. From
Daniel 11:5 on, the story is transposed to a war between the
kingdom of the South and the kingdom of the North. On the
scale of the history of great civilizations, the northern
empire mentioned here cannot be limited to ancient Greece,
which is now extinct. It represents the whole Greco-Roman
culture inherited racially and spiritually by the Aryan, the
man of the North. And the Southern kingdom represents the
rest of mankind as defined in opposition to Aryan mankind.
This idea corresponds very well to the above citation: "I
once asked Hitler what he was, whether he was German or
European, and he gave me this quite surprising answer: 'I am
Greek'".
>Daniel 11:9 Then the king of the North
>will invade the realm of the king of the
>South but will retreat to his own country
>Daniel 11:10 His sons will prepare for
>war and assemble a great army, which
>will sweep on like an irresistible flood
>and carry the battle as far as his
>fortress.
I'm not able to decode the conflicts between the South and
the North mentioned before Daniel 11:10, but I think it
concerns periods of history very far in the past.
But the most important is to focus on the expression "His
sons" of verse 10. This expression indicates a time shift:
the series of events is shifted to the modern era. In
anthropological terms, the northern Aryan men who have kept
themselves pure to this day are the (racial) heirs of the
Greeks from Daniel's time. Moreover, the whole history of
the world is the history of the Aryan expansion against the
rest of the world. This very vast war went through a
military episode from 1914 to 1945.
The formulation "his sons will prepare for war" announces a
Germany well prepared to wage a First World War. It will be
able to advance well on all fronts and it will "sweep on
like an irresistible flood and carry the battle as far as
his fortress". Indeed, at the beginning, Germany and the
Central Powers were able to advance very well into the lands
of the enemy, or "as far as his fortresses".
>Daniel 11:11 Then the king of the South
>will march out in a rage and fight
>against the king of the North, who will
>raise a large army, but it will be
>defeated.
The King of the South here represents the allies who are
mobilizing. They manage to reverse their initial losses; the
"king of the North", or Germany, "will be defeated."
>Daniel 11:12 When the army [My note: of
>the king of the North] is carried off,
>the king of the South will be filled
>with pride and will slaughter many
>thousands, yet he will not remain
>triumphant.
The Allies will be very arrogant and they will impose a very
harsh Treaty of Versailles on the Central Powers. In both
world conflicts, the allies (France, Russia, the United
States, England, etc.) played de facto for the enemies of
Aryan mankind. But the victory of the Allies in World War 1
will be short-lived, or they "will not remain triumphant".
E) World War II
>Daniel 11:13 For the king of the North
>will muster another army, larger than
>the first; and after several years, he
>will advance with a huge army fully
>equipped.
Germany recovers thanks to Hitler and it manages to "muster
another army, larger than the first", i.e., even larger than
the one from World War I.
>Daniel 11:14 In those times many will
>rise against the king of the South.
>Those who are violent among your own
>people will rebel in fulfillment of the
>vision, but without success.
As a necessity of war, Hitler had to appeal to men with
strong temperaments, to people (usually) described as
violent or unsettling rather than peaceful. Some
translations use the expression "those who love to fight"
instead of "those who are violent". And the Hebrew word
behind the adjective "violent" can also be translated as
"fierce" (see Note 2 for the exact source). The same word
is used in Isaiah 35:9 where many French translations
suggest a notion of "fierce beast" (see also Note 2).
Here is the outline of the rest of this section:
E.1) The fall of Paris
E.2) Hitler gains almost complete power over Europe
E.3) Hitler's diplomatic agreements
E.4) The war spreads overseas and becomes global
E.5) Stalin inflicts a major defeat on Hitler and victory
changes sides
E.6) Hitler retreats to his bunker and is definitely defeated
E.7) On the place of the Slavs in the war (of the Aryan
expansion)
E.1) The fall of Paris
>Daniel 11:15 Then the king of the North
>will come and build up siege ramps and
>will capture a fortified city. The
>forces of the South will be powerless to
>resist; even their best troops will not
>have the strength to stand.
This passage describes how the King of the North (Hitler as
the representative of European civilization) manages to
"capture a fortified city". This prophecy must be about
Paris, a city (inefficiently) fortified by the Maginot line.
I repeat that the French official power and the allies
fought against the interests of European mankind in World
War II.
E.2) Hitler gains almost complete power over Europe
>Daniel 11:16 The invader will do as he
>pleases; no one will be able to stand
>against him. He will establish himself
>in the Beautiful Land and will have the
>power to destroy it.
The Beautiful Land must represent (continental) Europe
that the German armies controlled for a few years. This
Beautiful Land was already mentioned in Daniel 8:9, which
discusses a horn "which started small but grew in power to
the south, and to the east and towards the Beautiful Land".
I think this horn is another prophecy on organized Jewry,
but the goal for now is to locate this Beautiful Land. And
if we associate it with Europe and thus place it to the
northwest western part of the world, this ties in perfectly
with the expression "to the south, and to the east and
towards the Beautiful Land".
The expression "will have the power to destroy it" announces
this: around 1940-1943 Hitler could have completely
destroyed all this beautiful Europe, including the City of
Lights (Paris). But he mainly fought against the Jewish
France and not against the artistic creations of the French
people, which he must have appreciated. Otherwise, he would
have flattened this beautiful city of Paris.
E.3) Hitler's diplomatic agreements
>Daniel 11:17 He will determine to come
>with the might of his entire kingdom and
>will make an alliance with the king of
>the South. And he will give him a
>daughter in marriage in order to
>overthrow the kingdom, but his plans
>will not succeed or help him.
Instead of trying to destroy Europe, Hitler mobilized most
of his army against his most critical enemy: the
Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet Union. It is clear we are in the
middle of a discussion about war maneuvers involving global
powers. The marriage mentioned here cannot refer to some
sentimental relationship, but rather to a political
marriage. Historically, the marriages of princes have often
been accompanied by transfers of power over territories.
Even the Bible mentions (1 Kings 9:16) a Pharaoh giving a
city as a gift at his daughter's wedding with Solomon. Thus,
I see this "marriage" as a reference to the agreements that
Hitler made with his enemies before invading them. Through
the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, he tried to deceive the Soviets
by promising them territorial gains. This started a kind of
German-Soviet honeymoon, which ended completely in 1941
(since Operation Barbarossa started in June 1941).
Before that, Hitler had signed the Munich Agreement to
reassure France and the United Kingdom. The phrase "his
plans will not succeed or help him" announces that Hitler's
alliance policy will fail. Indeed, all the great powers
ended up fighting against him. Hitler discussed in Mein
Kampf how he would have liked to make an alliance with Great
Britain. The failure of his external alliance policy was
one of the main factors explaining the defeat of the Axis.
E.4) The war spreads overseas and becomes global
>Daniel 11:18 Then he will turn his
>attention to the coastlands and will
>take many of them.
Many translations use the word "islands" instead of
"coastlands", which must represent the territories beyond
the seas and the oceans with regards to continental Europe.
Thus, Hitler declared war on England and on the United
States. Japan attacked at Pearl Harbor. In the beginning,
the Axis dominated certain Pacific Islands or the coasts of
North Africa.
E.5) Stalin inflicts a major defeat on Hitler and victory
changes sides
>Daniel 11:18 (continued) but a
>commander will put an end to his
>insolence and will turn his insolence
>back on him.
This commander giving a fatal blow to Hitler must be
Stalin. Victory changed sides after the battle of
Stalingrad. I have not found the word "insolence" in any
French translation; they prefer the word "opprobrium". For
example, the Louis Segond translation says "a leader will
put an end to the opprobrium he [Hitler] wanted to bring
upon him [upon Stalin], and will bring it upon himself
[upon Hitler]." Hitler wanted to humiliate Stalin, but the
opposite happened.
Beyond the strictly military context, I wonder if this
passage does not criticize Hitler of a form of insolence in
the more general sense of the term. Note 3 develops this
question in more detail.
E.6) Hitler retreats to his bunker and is definitely defeated
>Daniel 11:19 After this, he will turn
>back toward the fortresses of his own
>country but will stumble and fall, to be
>seen no more.
After that, in the final stage of the war, Hitler turned
"back toward the fortresses of his own country". This must
be a reference to Hitler's bunker. In 1945, the Soviets
reached his bunker and the Axis lost. The fact that Hitler
fell "to be seen no more" (also) means that his doctrine
will be banned from the public sphere.
E.7) On the place of the Slavs in the war (of the Aryan
expansion)
Certain hope that the Russians who gave this fatal blow to
the Aryan man at Stalingrad will soon become our allies,
because we are all white. But since Hitler is seen as an
anointed one in these prophecies, we should carefully read
what he wrote about the Slavs. And he explained multiple
times that the Slav mankind is not Aryan. We can at least
rely on his main book Mein Kampf that he wrote quietly and
carefully, being well aware that "in order to produce more
equality and uniformity in the defense of any doctrine, its
fundamental principles must be committed to writing."
Chapter 14 (volume 2) states that "The Russia of today,
deprived of its Germanic ruling class, is not a possible
ally in the struggle for German liberty, setting aside
entirely the inner designs of its new rulers." Further on,
the same chapter 14 gives more insight: "More often than
once inferior races with Germanic organizers and rulers as
their leaders became formidable States and continued to
exist as long as the racial nucleus remained which had
originally created each respective State. For centuries
Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the
Germanic nucleus of its governing class. But this nucleus is
now almost wholly broken up and abolished." Concerning the
non-Russian Slavs, the end of chapter 3 (volume 1) denounces
the risk of race mixing associated to their presence in
Vienna (he mentioned the Czechs, the Poles, the Serbs, the
Ruthenes, etc.).
In my opinion, the Slavs can be useful in a Christian
struggle for liberation only if they accept an Aryan
direction. This is consistent with the fact that they
adopted Christianity as a religion imported from the Aryan
world; the Russian Church remained under the authority of
Constantinople until the 15th century. The primary impulse
came from the Aryan world as for many other formidable
Slavic achievements. This converges completely with the
above citation where Hitler mentions the creation or
existence of formidable states "with Germanic organizers and
rulers as their leaders".
Moreover, it is very difficult to place the Slavs on the
racial basis of the Aryan ancient Greek kingdom mentioned by
Daniel. In Daniel's time, the Slavs were at thousands of
miles away in God knows what Asian steppes. And they arrived
in Europe about 1000-1500 years later.
This interpretation is entirely in line with episode 10 in
which I described (in Section 10.1.2 on Apocalypse 16:12-13)
how the three words "liberty equality fraternity" started
the war of Gog and Magog against the Aryan man. Section
4.bis.2 provided arguments that identify Gog with the Jews
and Magog with the Slavs.
F) The Marshall Plan
>Daniel 11:20 His successor will send out
>a tax collector to maintain the royal
>splendor. In a few years, however, he
>will be destroyed, yet not in anger or
>in battle.
The tax collector represents the American public sector that
invested money to reconstruct Europe according to the
Marshall Plan. The purpose was to maintain an attractive
Europe ("maintain royal splendor"). Many did not understand
what Europe had to give in exchange: it had to accept a
denazification process. We do not even have the right to use
the word "Aryan" in public. Nevertheless, for a period of
about 30 years (roughly the years 1945-1975 called the
Glorious Thirty in France), there was a rather functional
symbiosis between the Jews and the peoples of European
descent. Many were economically very satisfied.
But these two factors -- a still-rich population and a
denazified worldview -- made the West very attractive to
non-European immigration. This immigration has gradually
increased to reach today a level that was unimaginable in
1945. The American-European economic splendor consolidated
by the Marshall Plan "will be destroyed, yet not in anger or
in battle", that is, it will gradually vanish in a peaceful
manner. In other words, the Aryan man is likely to perish
through a slow moral apocalypse and not because of some
violent military battle.
G) More and more top leadership positions in the Western
states are increasingly openly taken over by jews
>Daniel 11:21 He will be succeeded by a
>contemptible person who has not been
>given the honor of royalty. He will
>invade the kingdom when its people feel
>secure, and he will seize it through
>intrigue.
For the first 30 years after the war, the jews were not
officially in control of all top levels of power in Europe
and America [they preferred to stay in the shadows]. But
year after year, they gradually took over more and more leading
positions, pursuing the goal of becoming official masters of
the West. Thus, the "contemptible person who has not been
given the honor of royalty" must be the jew, because he
usurped by intrigue and flattery this position of master of
the West. If the Western-Christian peoples did not notice
the jews plotting cunningly for years, it is because they
thought they had all reasons to "feel secure".
>Daniel 11:22 Then an overwhelming army
>will be swept away before him; both it
>and a prince of the covenant will be
>destroyed.
>Daniel 11:23 After coming to an agreement
>with him, he will act deceitfully, and
>with only a few people he will rise to
>power.
The NLT translation states that "great armies will be swept
away". This indicates that the Jew will be successful in
implanting his worldview in the minds of many people. The
"prince of the covenant" may (also) include the leaders of
the official churches. They have abandoned their traditional
beliefs and they all need to be Jew-respectful in order to
exist: we see female bishops in the Anglican Church, respect
for Islam everywhere, a lot of advertising for sponsoring
niggers on many Christian websites, many churches that
welcome non-European refugees without any screening, etc. In
short, this little Jewish people will act "deceitfully, and
with only a few people he will rise to power".
>Daniel 11:24 When the richest provinces
>feel secure, he will invade them and
>will achieve what neither his fathers
>nor his forefathers did. He will
>distribute plunder, loot and wealth
>among his followers. He will plot the
>overthrow of fortresses -- but only for
>a time.
While most whites though they could "feel secure" because of
a certain material wealth, the jew achieved "what neither
his fathers nor forefathers did": extort the wealth of white
men and distribute it "among his followers", i.e., to the
non-European allies of world Jewry. The end of this verse
nevertheless reassures us: this "plot" of organized Jewry to
overthrow our "fortresses" will not last forever, but "only
for a time".
[Note to the English edition: the expression "think tank"
popular in English captures very well the way you could
understand a term such as "overthrow of fortresses".
Imagine a "think tank" attacking our "think stronghold": the
jew engaged us in a spiritual conflict that aims at
confusing our mind and overthrowing our identity.]
H) After the Cold War, the jew starts the final globalization
stage so as to shape the whole humankind according to
his worldview
During the Cold War, the jews did not have a very direct
control over all states on Earth. It was still a world with
two competing super-powers; Stalin, for example, was able to
remove the jews from power since the 1960s. All communist
states in Eastern Europe were not necessarily dominated by
jews. The Arab countries were still living in their own
way; China was a bit disconnected from world trade, etc.
But once the Soviet Union collapsed, the United States
became the unique center of the world; their hegemony was
indisputable around 1990-2000.
The verses below describe how the West tried after 1990 to
impose its commercial system and its Jewish-inspired
conception of life to the whole world.
>Daniel 11:25 With a large army he will
>stir up his strength and courage against
>the king of the South. The king of the
>South will wage war with a large and
>very powerful army, but he will not be
>able to stand because of the plots
>devised against him.
>Daniel 11:26 Those who eat from the
>king's provisions will try to destroy
>him; his army will be swept away, and
>many will fall in battle.
We see an assault of the jew-ridden West against other
countries of the world (the South). In a first stage, this
took the form of a political, economic and moral assault
rather than a military one. The South will often be defeated
not by armies, but mainly "because of the plots devised
against him". This must include, for example, the US-backed
color revolutions (officially intended) to "bring democracy"
to other countries of the world.
>Daniel 11:27 The two kings, with their
>hearts bent on evil, will sit at the
>same table and lie to each other, but to
>no avail, because an end will still come
>at the appointed time.
The atmosphere of the negotiations is in a state of high
tension: all our (bogus) politicians and decision-makers
have their "hearts bent on evil"; they only try to deceive
each other.
>Daniel 11:28 The king of the North will
>return to his own country with great
>wealth, but his heart will be set
>against the holy covenant. He will take
>action against it and then return to his
>own country.
The jewish-dominated West accumulates "great wealth". Asian
peoples work for miserable wages in a Western economic
system that became completely globalized. For example, the
WTO (World Trade Organization) founded in 1994 has already
integrated almost all countries of the world, including
China in 2001. All this trade will generate "great wealth"
which the Western oligarchy will use to promote its
spiritual and moral war.
Verse 11:28 above describes how this oligarchy "will return
to his own country with great wealth, but his heart will be
set against the holy covenant." I tend to believe that the
main desire (or obsession) of the Jews will remain their
great internal war against European mankind and against his
sacred Christian sentiment ("the holy covenant").
I) The Jew starts to partially lose the control of the
non-white world around the time of writing (2022)
>Daniel 11:29 At the appointed time he
>will invade the South again, but this
>time the outcome will be different from
>what it was before.
The confrontation between the North and the South continues,
but a time will come when "the outcome will be different
from what it was before". I think this announces a major
shift in the global geopolitical balance. The American
hegemony consolidated immediately after the Cold War begins
to fade. If the Jewish-dominated Western powers lose global
supremacy, the center of the world is likely to shift
(eastward), with many negative consequences for the
whites.
The western countries are already weakened by the mediocrity
of their democracies. The power that the United States
exerted over the rest of the world since 1990 has already
been greatly reduced, both economically and militarily.
NATO has not even been able to overthrow the Syrian regime
since the 2010s. Many other arab countries in the Middle
East have become very rich and independent. The Russians
can now militarily attack foreign countries without paying
attention to the shouts of the jewish-dominated Western
press. The Asians are less and less dependent on their
(trade) agreements with the West.
>Daniel 11:30 Ships of the western
>coastlands [or Kittim in Hebrew] will
>oppose him, and he will lose heart.
>Then he will turn back and vent his fury
>against the holy covenant. He will
>return and show favor to those who
>forsake the holy covenant.
Completing the information from the previous verse, Daniel
11:30 mentions the rise in power of an empire named Kittim.
The word Kittim seems to me a correct transliteration of the
original Hebrew word (which had four letters: Kaf, Tav, Yod,
and Mem). It may represent China or other Asian powers. As
discussed in Section 4bis.2.C, there is a phonetic
similarity between Kittim and the Khitans, an Asian people
of around 900-1100. According to the Wikipedia entry of the
Khitans, "the Khitai variant of their name gave Cathay, the
name by which Europe referred to China in the Middle Ages".
The "western coastlands" mentioned at the beginning of verse
11:30 do not appear in the original manuscripts; I think
this is just the interpretation of those who identified
Kittim with the island of Cyprus in the western
Mediterranean. But the essential is that the Jewish power
will "lose heart" when faced to this external challenger
Kittim.
But externally limited, the Jew will intensify his great
internal war against the nations of European descent and
especially against their Christian spirituality; thus, he
"will vent his fury against the holy covenant". The fact of
showing "favor to those who abandon the holy covenant" warns
us that he will encourage society to belittle and slander
our Christian ideals even more. The phenomenon is actually
already visible today, but it must intensify (see Note 4).
J) The Jew completes around 2050-2060 the installation of the
abomination of desolation, starting the great tribulation
>Daniel 11:31 His armed forces will rise
>up to desecrate the temple fortress and
>will abolish the daily sacrifice. Then
>they will set up the abomination that
>causes desolation.
>Daniel 11:32 With flattery he will
>corrupt those who have violated the
>covenant, but the people who know their
>God will firmly resist him.
The Jew finds his greatest satisfaction when he succeeds
in spoiling the Christian sacred values and the religious
sentiment, i.e., when he manages « to desecrate the temple
fortress ». I think that the abolition of the "daily
sacrifice" indicates that the Jew will succeed in tearing
down all traditional morals and beliefs of the Aryan
Christian peoples. This process will culminate with the
full installation of the abomination of desolation ("the
sacrilegious object that causes desecration") around 2055,
as described in point C) in Part 1.
The beginning of episode 2 mentioned a sermon of Jesus that
did warn us about this abomination, also called the
sacrilegious object that causes desecration. [Note to the
English edition: Jesus said in Mat 24:15 that "'The time
will come when you will see what Daniel the prophet spoke
about: the sacrilegious object that causes desecration
standing in the Holy Place'-- reader, pay attention!", see
also Mar 13:14 ] According to Mat 24:21, Mar 13:19 and Luk
21:23 (see point F of episode 2), this abomination of
desolation marks the beginning of the great tribulation. To
be able to resist, Jesus said that we "must flee to the
hills", that is, carry out a clandestine guerrilla activity
of resistance outside public sphere (point B, episode 2).
[Note to the English version: Jesus also said in Mar
13:15-16 that "A person outside the house must not go back
into the house to pack. A person in the field must not
return even to get a coat." This may be an indication that
you have to detach yourself from our jew-ridden system and
forget the way this world tells you to think without even
looking back (or without returning "even to get a coat")].
I do not have more information to describe this abomination
of desolation very precisely. I can only extrapolate from
the current situation. It may first refer to a degradation
in terms of human identity, personality and race. The
Jew-ridden mainstream media may shout even louder to impose
their worldview on us, to prevent the Aryan man from
procreating or to push him to miscegenation. The
world-level leadership may try to set up a global mass
surveillance system, more intrusive and repressive than in
the past. I am afraid of an unparalleled tyranny, as already
indicated at Point C). But Daniel reassures us: "the people
who know their God will firmly resist him."
>Daniel 11:33 Those who are wise will
>instruct many, though for a time they
>will fall by the sword or be burned or
>captured or plundered.
There will always be great minds of European descent who
will remain faithful to the truth and proclaim it to the
masses; they will strive to preserve a properly structured
Aryan knowledge, faithful to the great European
civilization. But they will be able to share their
knowledge only in certain small communities, often on the
Internet. Some of them already need to stay anonymous, by
hiding their activity behind special computer networks (VPN,
Tor in 2022). Many others are already harassed by the
justice system. The global jew-ridden leadership will do
everything to prevent them from communicating with the
masses.
>Daniel 11:34 When they fall, they will
>receive a little help, and many who are
>not sincere will join them.
Our aforementioned great Aryan minds will have a hard time
in finding people to sincerely defend them in public. The
authorized right-wing press will never honestly defend
[Christian] nationalists or white supremacists. Even the
"little help" that our pro-white activists may receive will
not be sincere and solid. If you see a few politicians that
take sporadic steps encouraging freedom of speech, do not
trust them too much, because "many who are not sincere will
join them". In fact, the whole system was deliberately
designed to occasionally allow some ephemeral victories of
(far-)right ideas in some elections. You may see from time
to time some healthy vigorous reactions of Old Europe in the
mainstream media. But the ruling world clique -- Jewish or
affiliated -- will never allow a far-right political party
go too far in defending white men.
For example, Donald Trump could be elected in America and
many put their trust on him; some believed he was a
providential man. But no! Towards the end of his term as
president, he granted more pardons to Jews than to
right-wing white supremacists. In France, the Le Pen family
may have scored well in various elections, but they will
never go too far in defending those who vote for them.
If you ever see an accredited journalist pointing out the
high level of non European immigration or denouncing the
overrated status of jews as victims, don't expect a serious
reversal. It is like when a sports coach allows someone to
play a little differently for five minutes, to show some
plurality in the style. Nothing lasting can come out of it:
it's the coach who decided to play only 5 minutes like that,
to maintain some appearances of impartiality.
>Daniel 11:35 Some of the wise will
>stumble, so that they may be refined,
>purified and made spotless until the
>time of the end, for it will still come
>at the appointed time.
Under such extremely difficult conditions, it will be very
difficult to remain faithful to the truth or to proclaim it
to the masses. Even some of our best racially-conscious
intellectuals will "stumble".
K) Even the strongest men will completely drop their
guard in front of the gas chamber myth
>Daniel 11:36 The king will do as he
>pleases. He will exalt and magnify
>himself above every god and will say
>unheard-of things against the God of
>gods. He will be successful until the
>time of wrath is completed, for what has
>been determined must take place.
>Daniel 11:37 He will show no regard for
>the gods of his ancestors or for the one
>desired by women, nor will he regard any
>god, but will exalt himself above them
>all.
The king of the white world (of the northern kingdom) is
organized Jewry as already discussed. The level of arrogance
of the jews will reach an unimaginable level. They will
have no real admiration for their religion; most Jews do not
go to synagogue. The God of the Jew is the Jew who loves
himself! His power that has become so great will be the
only thing that matters.
The god "desired by women" in verse 37 symbolizes feminism.
Daniel announces that the jew will have "no regard" for this
god so honored by many others. I also tend to believe
that the jews did not promote feminism by true genuine love
for women. They just wanted to attack the white man, whom
they correctly identified as the main element sustaining
Aryan civilization. Paraphrasing the Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion, the jews understood very clearly
that "the lower classes of the goyim [note: including women
in the context of the time around 1900] will follow our lead
against our rivals for power, the intellectuals of the
goyim, not for the sake of attaining the good, not even to
win wealth, but solely out of hatred towards the
privileged."
[Note the English female readers: did you notice the media
are not overly-interested in feminism when it can not stir
up hatred for white heterosexual males? There are endless
references to women described as "influential" of "powerful"
in the news, but very few dare to speak about the violence
that non-whites perpetrate against them -- a phenomenon that
will hurt more and more women over the coming decades.]
>Daniel 11:38 Instead of them, he will
>honor a god of fortresses; a god unknown
>to his ancestors he will honor with gold
>and silver, with precious stones and
>costly gifts.
This new "god of fortresses" has often been transliterated
as "Maozim" and interpreted as a proper noun. The above NIV
translation followed a different track, that of a common
noun. This common noun was derived from a Hebrew word
that can indeed be translated as "fortress" or "stronghold".
This leads to the idea of a God of power, the rule of force,
hence a "god of fortresses".
This is entirely in line with modern society: the modern
man submits only to the rule of force or to the law of the
strongest. The Jews have shaped the world in their own
image, as they said in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion:
"The intensified struggle for superiority and shocks
delivered to economic life will create, nay, have already
created, disenchanted, cold and heartless communities."
But this idea of a God or law of the strongest seems to me
incomplete, because it is not something new (for the jew).
How can one identify a new God "unknown to his ancestors"?
If one makes an absolute analysis of the modern world, the
colossal force of the jew is ultimately based on the myth of
the homicidal gas chamber of Adolf Hitler. This is the
supreme God of our time. It offers the jew the most
formidable weapon to prevent any Aryan (racial) awakening:
it is enough to say "we know where that leads, to Adolf
Hitler and to his gas chamber" to forever close any
argument. The honoring of this myth with "with gold and
silver, with precious stones and costly gifts" indicates
that great fortunes are invested to promote -- or more
exactly, sell -- this new God. This financial dimension of
this myth is best captured by the English saying "There is
no business like Shoah business."
The proper noun Maozim has never been used elsewhere on this
Earth (according to my web searching) and it is too short to
be able to assign it any definite meaning with full
certainty. But I can provide a possible interpretation. The
letter "o" comes from the Greek letter "omega" which was a
transliteration of the letter "Ayin" from the Hebrew
alphabet. I understood that this transliteration was often
used in antiquity. But this is not the only possibility.
The words "Gaza" or "Gomorrah" have Hebrew-Biblical origins
and the letter "G" comes from the same letter "Ayin". This
transliteration leads to the word Mag-Zim instead of Maozim.
The prefix "Mag-" can be easily associated to the word
"magic", or "Magisch" in German. The German word "Zimmer"
means room or chamber. As such, Mag-Zim (Magisch-Zimmer) may
represent a magical German room, or the famous gas chamber.
Note 5 elaborates more in detail a few (other) ways to
interpret this word.
>Daniel 11:39 He will attack the
>mightiest fortresses with the help of a
>foreign god [Many translations say: of
>this foreign god] and will greatly
>honor those who acknowledge him. He
>will make them rulers over many people
>and will distribute the land at a price
>[or land as a reward].
Even the strongest men will lower their guard (and head)
when faced to this foreign god Maozim interpreted above as
Mag-Zim, Magisch-Zimmer or the gas chamber. On this basis,
the Jews will reward their followers with top leadership
positions.
L) A more uncertain future when the jewish dominated Aryan
mankind will even turn against its own fatherland
>Daniel 11:40 At the time of the end
>the king of the South will engage him in
>battle, and the king of the North will
>storm out against him with chariots and
>cavalry and a great fleet of ships. He
>will invade many countries and sweep
>through them like a flood.
This verse describes a future that I cannot grasp with
certainty. I feel the rise in power of some non-European
nations that will oppose the Jew-ridden western powers. The
Atlantic coalition may be pushed (economically or
militarily) into new wars. This risks extending the series
of wars started by NATO since 1990 (Iraq, Kosovo, Syria,
Libya, etc.).
>Daniel 11:41 He will also invade the
>Beautiful Land. Many countries will
>fall, but Edom, Moab and the leaders of
>Ammon will be delivered from his hand.
The expression "Beautiful Land" has already been used in
Daniel 11:16. At point E.2), I said that it represents the
beautiful Europe that Hitler could have destroyed around
1940-1943. This verse announces that the jewish-dominated
Aryan nations will en up attacking their own fatherland,
Europe itself.
Up to now (up to 2022), NATO has always only attacked
non-Western countries. And many Europeans and Americans
assumed that NATO would always naturally only target foreign
states. Many have not understood that we live in a
plutocracy ruled by Jewish or Jew-respectful oligarchies
that are not attached to any specific state in particular.
Since these elites do not recognize themselves in the
average individual of their states, they do not make any
difference between killing a low-class white man (in Europe)
or a low-class arab (outside Europe).
Some peoples will find a way to escape, but I cannot
identify them. I can only say that Edom can refer to all men
who will still continue to embody the European spirit as
described in Episode 6.
All the armies, fortresses and attacks mentioned by Daniel
are not necessarily only of a purely military nature. They
can also refer to great battles of ideas, to intellectual
confrontations, to moral and spiritual aggressions, etc.
Daniel mentions several times the interaction with entities
like "the prince of the Persian kingdom" (10:13), "the
prince of Greece" (10:20) or "the great prince who protects
your people" (12:1). In fact, most translations use a word
"angel" or "spirit" instead of "prince". In particular,
Daniel 10:20 announces that the prince (or angel) of Greece
will help the prince (or angel) of God in his fight against
the spirit of Persia. These verses must first evoke a very
large confrontation in terms of worldview (of attitude
towards life) between the spirit of the Aryan northern man
-- placed on the (racial) foundations of ancient Greece --
and the rest of mankind (the South including Persia).
>Daniel 11:42 He will extend his power
>over many countries; Egypt will not
>escape.
>Daniel 11:43 He will gain control of the
>treasures of gold and silver and all the
>riches of Egypt, with the Libyans and
>Cushites in submission.
The Jews dominate a long list of peoples.
>Daniel 11:44 But reports from the east
>and the north will alarm him, and he
>will set out in a great rage to destroy
>and annihilate many.
>Daniel 11:45 He will pitch his royal
>tents between the seas at the beautiful
>holy mountain. Yet he will come to his
>end, and no one will help him.
This passage announces a very high international tension
that is difficult to describe. One can assume that
previously jew-friendly or jew-dominated peoples from the
North may revolt (for once) against their Jewish masters.
Several English translations (KJV) use a formulation "out of
the east and out of the north", which suggests that this
idea does not concern a united "north-east" block, but
rather the north and the east as separate entities.
At the same time, there will be more and more tensions
between the Jewish system and the rest of the world. The
last sentence above prophesies that no one will still play
for the jew longer towards the (end of the) end. The French
Septuagint translation by P. Giguet says "No one will be
able to save him".
FINAL CONCLUSION
I could not find a single comma to remove from these
visionary writings of Daniel. In my analysis, I have
matched everything he announced to a past event or to a
historical process -- with regards, at least, to history
prior to current year 2022.
-------
Note 1
Bible prophecies often measure time in "days," "months,"
"years," or "weeks," etc. These represent prophetic periods,
the duration of which must be determined. For this purpose,
one can try to assign various values to any such duration
until the result makes sense. Thus, the key for uncovering
the prophetic writings can be discovered as if one were
looking for the secret key of a message encrypted by a
computer algorithm: try different secret keys (or passwords)
until one of them succeeds in turning the encrypted message
into a readable text. This is how I preferred to evaluate a
prophetic "seven" of Daniel 9:27 to 7 periods of 30 years
(and not a single period or week of 30 years).
The text was written using a dead language spoken 2500 years
ago; it is very difficult to find the original meaning with
complete accuracy. I have used for this episode the very
popular English translation NIV (New International Version)
which, in my opinion, renders the meaning of the original
text in a very clear way. For some verses, I have also
drawn comparisons with the NLT (New Living Translation). A
great prophet like Daniel could have had a vision even over
the future translations of his writings.
--------
Note 2
The Hebrew word behind the adjective "violent" is composed
of the letters Pe, Resh, Yod, Tsadi followed by the suffix
Yod. The Hebrew-French dictionary of M. N. Ph. Sander and M.
I. Trenel published in Paris in 1859 indicates on page 594
that this word can also be translated by "fierce" ("féroce"
in French). I also tried to find its Septuagint translation.
In fact, this word does not even appear in the "New English
Translation of the Septuagint" (published in 2007) which
uses the expression "the fallen of your nation". Without
being an expert, I understood that the Septuagint of the
book of Daniel only survived in two manuscripts discovered
after 1750. It is therefore only in modern times that the
true Septuagint of Daniel's book was made available.
Traditionally, most Biblical exegetes have replaced the
original Septuagint of the book of Daniel with a
"Theodosion" translation.
-------
Note 3
Verse 11:18 seems to accuse Hitler of a certain insolence or
arrogance. It may be a legitimate arrogance toward other
men or an illegitimate arrogance toward God. The verse is
too short to bring a very clear conclusion by itself. I can
only share my apprehensions.
I recall an idea from point K: "The God of the Jew is the
Jew who loves himself!". But I wonder if the German people
did not fall into a similar error during the National
Socialist era? According to (my understanding of) Hitler's
ideology, the god of the Germanic man is the Germanic man
who loves himself -- or, more broadly, the European man who
loves himself. Hitler aroused in many a cult of the Aryan
race and some have thus fallen into a form veneration of
their own nature. I do not question the superiority of the
Aryan race over other races. But this is not enough to give
the Aryan man the right to crown himself as his own God.
Whether we like it or not, this is God's will: any system
that puts a group of men as the main cornerstone at the
center of the world is doomed to fail (like the Tower of
Babel). No man has the right to crown himself as God.
Constantine conquered Rome after a vision that encouraged
him to seek his fortune under the sign of Christ. Before a
very important battle, he saw a symbol of Christ in the sky,
hence the famous saying "In hoc signo vinces" or "By this
sign, you will conquer". But there is nothing similar about
Hitler, about his battles or about his followers; to my
knowledge, they did not seek (too) much help from Heaven.
-------
Note 4
Already as of 2022, the Christian religion never receives
any positive coverage in the news. Each time the Church is
mentioned by the mainstream media, it is (almost) always to
discredit the clergy. But the same press never mentions the
increasing number of churches vandalized by immigrants. Our
churches will probably be progressively filled with more and
more niggers to whom we will have to forgive everything.
In fact, the Jew has already removed all our ties to Heaven
or Earth. The average Aryan knows no God and no Church that
exults the beauty or the noble spirit of our great saints.
We have almost no history of our own to honor the heroes
buried in our ancestral fatherland. If the mainstream media
ever talk about our White ancestors, it is often in a
"cancel culture" endeavor. According to the established
media cartel, you only have one duty in terms of history
learning: to never forget the 6 million Jews. And I think
that the spectrum of acceptable ideas in the public sphere
will progressively shrink to "Nazism is evil" or its
derivatives. Even the promotion of the various Asian ways
of thinking (Zen, Yoga, Buddhism, etc.) fits into the jewish
program that tries to diminish our spirituality.
-------
Note 5
The proper noun Maozim has almost never been used on this
Earth and there are very few clues to understand it. I
explained in the main text how the Hebrew character "Ayin"
can also be transliterated as "g" instead of "o", so that
Mao-Zim can actually become Mag-Zim. And Mag-Zim can be
seen as a contraction of the German words "Magisch" and
"Zimmer", which can lead us to a magic German room. This is
the first modern reference that could lift the veil over the
mystery surrounding this new jewish god.
The letter "Ayin" exists in several alphabets; its
pronunciation may have evolved over time and according to
the various peoples who used it. Depending on the dialect,
some people pronounce it today a bit like a French guttural
"r" (see details on the voiced pharyngeal fricative in the
appendix). This track leads to the word Mar-Zim. Believing
in providence or not, it seems that all roads lead to the
same gas chamber myth. The German word Mär means "an often
repeated untruth, a fable, a false narrative," according to
wiktionnary.org (see the last two pages of the appendix).
Modern Jews do not use this vocabulary to make white people
feel guilty. Certainly, the word "Zimmer" never appears on
the plans of the alleged gas chambers. But Daniel could not
have described the gas chamber myth more explicitly, because
the notion of explicit open prophecy would almost be a
contradiction in terms. The use of a word like "Gaskammer"
could have warned the Old Testament Jewish scholars to the
prophesied facts, so that they can avoid them.
The Jewish scholars have always been (very) well informed
about the sacred texts and the Christian mindset. This
enabled them to determine with almost mathematical certainty
the best means to exploit their weaknesses and to mislead
them. The whole religion of the alleged Jewish holocaust is,
moreover, modeled on the Christian mindset and mental
structure; it is like a new river flowing on the bed of a
vanished river. The persecutions of the Christian saints
have been replaced by the alleged extermination of the 6
million Jews. The cornerstone of their suffering, the gas
chamber, replaces the central suffering in Christianity
which is the crucifixion of Jesus.
EPISODE 8
A Church operating in secret (incognito) will remain alive
until Jesus returns
----
Contents:
8.1 Jesus' last words on Earth are very enigmatic
8.2 The prophetic interpretation of Jesus' last words on
Earth
8.3 An incognito Church in the image of the beloved disciple
will remain alive until the second coming of Jesus
8.4 The (very probable) thesis of a incognito great
theologian
8.5 The thesis of John the Apostle
8.6 Other less likely identities of the beloved disciple
----
The last chapter of John's Gospel deals with Jesus' final
days on Earth. Several apostles are fishing in a boat
alongside "two other disciples" (John 21:2). Jesus arrives
to tell them what to do in order to catch more fish. The
Bible made multiple times a link between "fishers of fish"
and "fishers of men". Peter was the first apostle called by
Jesus with the words: "Simon, do not be afraid; from now on
you will be a fisher of men" (Luke 5:10, Mat 4:19).
==============
8.1 Jesus' last words on Earth are very enigmatic
The last days of Jesus on Earth have a particular importance
for many believers. But the narration of this event in
John's gospel gives us an unexpected "detail"; it is the
precise number of fish they caught: 153. During those last
moments with the apostles, Jesus found nothing more
important to do than to ask them to stop and count the
number of fish? Was there nothing more interesting to talk
about in this last page of the last gospel? No: it was
really not the best time for such trivial facts. This number
must have a deeper meaning.
The number 153 is the sum of the first n=17 integers: 153 =
1+2+3 ... + 17. The adoption of an idea often goes through
this pyramidal process: at the beginning there is only one
man who embodies the idea (for us Jesus), then 2 other men
can be added (like Peter and his brother Andrew), then the
community attracts about 3 more men, then more, and more,
and so on.
There are several other enigmatic aspects in this last
chapter 21 of the gospel of John.
Jesus tells Peter that he will be captured by "another" who
will impose his will on him and eventually kill him:
> 21:18 But when you are old, you will
> stretch out your hands, and another
> will direct you and take you where
> you don't want to go. 19 Jesus said
> this to let him know by what kind of
> death he would glorify God. (NLT)
The original Greek text employs an expression using a
girdle, an encircling or ringlike structure, perhaps as below:
> 21:18 [...] But when you grow old, you
> will stretch out your hands, and
> someone else will fasten a belt
> around you and take you where you do
> not wish to go. (NRSV)
At the end, we see Jesus walking away, Peter following him,
and a "disciple whom Jesus loved" following Jesus and Peter.
This disciple whom Jesus loved is mentioned 5 times in this
gospel, very often next to Peter. Peter asks Jesus about the
fate of this disciple. Jesus replies:
>21:22 Jesus replied, "If I want him to
>remain alive until I return, what is
>that to you? As for you, follow me."
>21:23 So the rumor spread among the
>community of believers that this
>disciple wouldn't die. But that isn't
>what Jesus said at all. He only said,
>"If I want him to remain alive until I
>return, what is that to you?"
>21:24 This disciple is the one who
>testifies to these events and has
>recorded them here. And we know that
>his account of these things is
>accurate. (NLT)
Many interpreted this passage too literally: the "rumor" was
that this disciple whom Jesus loved would never die. But the
gospel insists that Jesus said something else; I believe
that this beloved disciple, as the author of this gospel,
rejected this way the idea of his physical immortality. A
different hypothesis is that Jesus was simply talking about
a walk he was going to make during that particular day.
Maybe. But why mentioning such a simple and prosaic thing in
such an important gospel chapter? If the Holy Spirit wanted
this gospel to come down to us in this form, it is because
it has a meaning that can interest us later -- beyond the
things they were doing on that particular day.
8.2 The prophetic interpretation of Jesus' last words on
Earth
Peter has often been regarded as the father of the visible
and organized Church. Jesus had already announced that the
Church would be built on this "stone" (Mat 16:18). Peter is
considered the first bishop of Rome or the first Pope.
Remember that the Orthodox and Protestant Christians all
represent different branches of the initial Apostolic
Church, even though they do not recognize the Pope today.
Peter is often listed first when the Bible mentions the
apostles.
Jesus mentions Peter's death for a double reason: the
physical death of Peter and the prophetic death of the
Church he founded. He describes how the church will die:
"you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will
fasten a belt around you and take you where you do not wish
to go". The hands of many modern Christian believers have
become weak. The Church is bound as with a rope: it is led
by "another", as if held with a lasso (in a psychological
magic spell).
The number 153 may represent the number of believers at any
given time, as described in Section 8.1 above (compare also
Note 1 below). This number of believers could increase over
time as follows: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, ..., 153, etc. These
values are part of a series of "triangular numbers". The
English Wikipedia entry for this concept shows today (late
2021) the following series: 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36,
45, 55, 66, 78, 91, 105, 120, 136, 153, 171, 190, 210, 231,
253, 276, 300, 325, 351, 378, 406, 435, 465, 496, 528, 561,
595, 630, 666... If Christians are not a community of
destiny, what strange coincidence has led the authors of this
Wikipedia entry (see image below) to end the series with
666? All visible churches today are led by "another". They
have all arrived in the 666 state [that represents the beast
from Revelation 13 (and 17). In my opinion, this beast aims
at restructuring Mankind according to undercover Marxist
ideas. The classical Marxism described in the 19th century
has many modern branches, promoted in disguise under
"positive" banners using words such as Equality, Equity,
Diversity, all supposed to help Mankind by putting and to
all sorts of real or supposed oppressions].